Re: Heads up: major rebase -i -p rework coming up
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jan 25, 2009, 15:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0901251622310.14855@racer>
- In-Reply-To
- <bd6139dc0901250707m5e1898cdu530a0d7566ca2da5@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 15:17, Johannes Schindelin > <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote: > >> >> merge (B) A # Merge... > >> > merge B parent A' # Merge... > >> merge B with A' # Merge... > > merge B Merge bla/blub > > parent A' bla/blub > > Oh goody, more painting! I was wondering when the next pick-a-word > contest would be!
In this case, it is not about painting. I will gladly ignore all those who think they must submit a new word for this action.
The thing is: I want the command to be intuitive, so I need a syntax where even the most idiotic dullard will understand what are the parents, and why we need the original merge's commit name, too.
So maybe I answered my question myself:
merge parents $sha1 [$sha1...] original $sha1 $msg
Ciao, Dscho