Re: Heads up: major rebase -i -p rework coming up
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jan 25, 2009, 20:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vwscjceec.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0901251622310.14855@racer>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> So maybe I answered my question myself: > > merge parents $sha1 [$sha1...] original $sha1 $msg
When you are reparenting, how would original commit get in the picture? You wouldn't want the resulting merge to claim it merged X (which would be what's in original's commit log) when in fact it now merged Y because the user reparented it, would you?