Re: [PATCH] interpret_nth_last_branch(): avoid traversing the reflogs twice
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jan 17, 2009, 19:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0901172028470.3586@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vljt97nld.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
Hi,
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes: > > > Instead of traversing them twice, we just build a list of branch switches, > > pick the one we're interested in, and free the list again. > > Isn't the code keeping them all in core, or am I reading the patch wrong? > > If you know that you are interested in the nth-from-the-last switch, and > if you are reading from the beginning, you would need to keep at most n > last switches you have seen in core, wouldn't you?
That is correct. But this is such a highly uncritical code path that I'd like to keep this simple rather than fast.
Ciao, Dscho