Re: [PATCH] filter-branch: add git_commit_non_empty_tree and --prune-empty.
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jan 11, 2009, 13:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0901111433580.3586@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <20090111111800.GA8032@artemis.corp>
Hi,
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 07:29:15PM +0000, Jay Soffian wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 09:27:29AM +0000, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > >> On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 04:58:44AM +0000, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > Bump, http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/99440/ > > > > (I'd like to see this included. Having a bunch of empty commits after > > using filter-branch to remove unwanted files from history is, er, > > sub-optimal, so seems like it might even be default behavior?) > > Yeah I have that in my own git tree, and I meant to ask if something had > to be fixed for it to be accepted for some time, but always forget about > it. > > Junio, do you think this could be accepted, or does it need some work ?
AFAICT Junio had some style issues which were not addressed.
And I suggested to merge the tests with Sverre's patch. That suggestion also went unaddressed.
Ciao, Dscho