Re: [PATCH] rollback index if git-commit is interrupted by a signal
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- May 29, 2008, 14:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0805291541430.13507@racer.site.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <483EBF1F.9000809@gnu.org>
Hi,
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> > IMO it would make much more sense to _guarantee_ that the > > commity_style variable is set before the index is locked. It is > > feasible, and there is no good reason not to do that. > > No, it's not possible because the COMMIT_PARTIAL case first creates the > index_lock and then the false_lock.
So why don't you fix _that_?
> It would be curious at least to set the commit_style to COMMIT_NORMAL > after creating the index_lock, and upgrade it to COMMIT_PARTIAL later > on. I contemplated that, and my patch is the simplest code that's > needed and works.
As I said, I think it is a regression, because you change code. Your argument as to why leaves me desiring another solution.
Nuff said, Dscho