Re: Git weekly news: 2008-49

> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Santi Béjar <santi@agolina.net> wrote:
>> 2008/12/5 Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>:
>>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>> But here are the links anyway. The order is rather random.
>>>>
>>>> Moreover the _quality_ of those links is very random.
>>>
>>> Exactly, I didn't choose them, that's what people have been tagging as
>>> "git" in delicious.com. I'm subscribed to the RSS feed and saving the
>>> ones that appear a lot.
>>>
>>> In fact I don't like some of them, but that's what the "public" finds
>>> interesting.
>>
>> So I don't see the value of such a list. You can go to delicious and
>> get it.
>
> Try it. You can't see which ones are new, which are completely
> irrelevant. There are duplicates and you can't see the popularity /
> freshness ratio, or "hotness", never mind the most popular this week.
>
> Apparently some people already found interesting links they haven't
> seen before, so at lest there's value for them.

>
>> Another thing that could be great is filtering this list to
>> those that pass a certain criteria (mainly quality, up to date, ...)
>> and present it in an attractive way, with summaries, categorized by
>> type (trick, tutorial, comparison,...), ...
>