Show 14 quoted lines
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> "Felipe Contreras" <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
>> ...
>> First, "Official git blog"? Official? There is nothing official about
>> it. "Unofficial git blog", or "A git developer blog" (or "A git
>> follower blog"; unfortunately names like gitter or gitster for git
>> power user's, like TeXnician for TeX users, are taken by nicknames on
>> #git, if I remember correctly). Only git maintainer (Junio Hamano)
>> and git development community (the git mailing list) can decide that
>> something is "official" resource.
>
> I asked in the mailing list and the only comment I got was: go ahead.
> So yeah, that doesn't look like an "official" blessing, but it's not
> bad either.
According to "http://marc.info/?t=121985955200002&r=1&w=2", you mentioned "Planet Git" and only one response other than yours on the topic was somebody offering server hosting space, so no, sorry, I do not see any evidence that your post produced any positive or negative feedback.
But I think this, if done right, is a great idea and everybody will welcome "Planet Git" as the "official weblog aggregator". I think a true "Git News" that is written by somebody to summarize the happenings in the Git land in a coherent voice would be much more preferable, but that takes real work (which you may or may not be interested in), and aggregated blog would be the best thing we can have without too much effort.
Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com>