Re: [PATCH/RFC] read-cache: fix file time comparisons with different precisions
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Sep 29, 2015, 13:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <acb5b10221675dd6cc6b9f3846cbe8c4@dscho.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <560A66A9.2010606@gmail.com>
Hi Karsten,
On 2015-09-29 12:23, Karsten Blees wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Am 28.09.2015 um 14:52 schrieb Johannes Schindelin: >> Otherwise there would be that little loop-hole where (nsec % 1000) == 0 *by chance* and we assume the timestamps to be identical even if they are not. > > Yeah, but in this case the file would be racy, as racy-checks use > the same comparison now.
True.
Show 6 quoted lines
> IMO change detection is so fundamental that it should Just Work, > without having a plethora of config options that we need to explain > to end users. > > If that means that once in a million cases we need an extra content > check to revalidate such falsely racy entries, that's fine with me.
You have a good point there. I retract my objections.
Thanks, Dscho