Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] odb: prepare `struct odb_transaction` to become generic
- From
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
- Date
- Feb 4, 2026, 06:26 UTC
- Message-ID
- <aYLmel06ANrskuG5@pks.im>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqfr7hqvzj.fsf@gitster.g>
On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 02:54:08PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com> writes: > > > So long as `struct odb_transaction` remains the first member of `struct > > odb_transaction_files`, using `container_of()` is functionally the same > > thing as casting. This is also how we do things for `odb_read_stream` > > and `odb_loose_read_stream` so I don't think it is too big of a deal > > either way. > > It would be a good theme to clean them all up, together with > existing ones, in a separate topic. Code hygiene matters.
Fair indeed. Justin, will you handle this cleanup once this topic here is merged or shall I do it?
Patrick