Re: [-SPAM-] What's cooking in git.git (Jul 2025, #03; Wed, 9)

> On 10/07/2025 22:12, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com> writes:
> > 
> >>
> >> How would you like to proceed? (yes, I haven't written the commit message
> >> yet).
> > 
> > ... appears near the end of the message, and the way _I_ would like
> > to proceed is to make sure two parties involved in overlapping
> > solutions to the same problem talk to each other and come up with a
> > solution together.  The first step to get you going would be to CC
> > the other parties involved.
> 
> Oops, I had intended to cc Patrick! :(
> 
> > If the controversial step in Patrick's 8-patch series is relatively
> > independent from others (which was the impression I got from "more
> > or less random cleanups and improvements"), one approach with less
> > friction is to simply omit it and make it 7-patch series.  While you
> > and Patric work out what the best approach to solve the libexecdir
> > problem, the rest of the series can proceed without waiting,
> > hopefully?
> 
> Yep, that would be my preferred route.
> 
> Having said that, Patrick's patch does remove the regression, so we
> could keep them separate if that is preferred. I don't mind either
> way. :)