Re: [-SPAM-] What's cooking in git.git (Jul 2025, #03; Wed, 9)

From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
Date: Jul 10, 2025, 21:44 UTC
Message-ID: <61a9185d-8ed8-4794-8f7e-1ed64503cc62@ramsayjones.plus.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqo6tr698f.fsf@gitster.g>

On 10/07/2025 22:12, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 11 quoted lines

> Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com> writes:
> 
>>
>> How would you like to proceed? (yes, I haven't written the commit message
>> yet).
> 
> ... appears near the end of the message, and the way _I_ would like
> to proceed is to make sure two parties involved in overlapping
> solutions to the same problem talk to each other and come up with a
> solution together.  The first step to get you going would be to CC
> the other parties involved.

Oops, I had intended to cc Patrick! :(

Show 7 quoted lines

> If the controversial step in Patrick's 8-patch series is relatively
> independent from others (which was the impression I got from "more
> or less random cleanups and improvements"), one approach with less
> friction is to simply omit it and make it 7-patch series.  While you
> and Patric work out what the best approach to solve the libexecdir
> problem, the rest of the series can proceed without waiting,
> hopefully?

Yep, that would be my preferred route.

Having said that, Patrick's patch does remove the regression, so we could keep them separate if that is preferred. I don't mind either way. :)

Thanks!

ATB, Ramsay Jones