Re: Better visual separation of hunks in `git add -p`

> Eugenio Bargiacchi <svalorzen@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> I'm looking for a way to print some sort of separator between hunks
>> when running `git add -p`, as I have a bit of trouble detecting when
>> the previous hunk begins and the current one starts. Being able to
>> print an empty line or a couple lines filled with "=======" would
>> really help me out.
> 
> Hmph, my hope when I designed that particular UI was that the
> command prompt for the previous interaction followed by the hunk
> header of the current hunk would give us clear enough separation.
> 
> For example, after answering "n" to the prompt for the previous
> hunk, we'd see
> 
>     ...
>     +   (merge bff85a338c bl/doc-key-val-sep-fix later to maint).
>     +
>       * Other code cleanup, docfix, build fix, etc.
>         (merge f0e578c69c rs/use-xstrncmpz later to maint).
>         (merge 83e6eb7d7a ba/credential-test-clean-fix later to maint).
>     (1/2) Stage this hunk [y,n,q,a,d,j,J,g,/,e,?]? n
>     @@ -233,3 +245,6 @@ Fixes since v2.44
>         (merge 781fb7b4c2 as/option-names-in-messages later to maint).
>         (merge 51d41dc243 jk/doc-remote-helpers-markup-fix later to 
> maint).
>         (merge e1aaf309db pb/ci-win-artifact-names-fix later to maint).
>     +   (merge ad538c61da jc/index-pack-fsck-levels later to maint).
>     +   (merge 67471bc704 ja/doc-formatting-fix later to maint).
>     ...
>     (2/2) Stage this hunk [y,n,q,a,d,K,g,/,e,?]?
> 
> The '@' (the first character of the hunk header line for the current
> hunk) and "(1/2" are surrounded by lines that begin with a space,
> and the hope was that it was sufficient "separator" already.
> 
> These days (long after I stopped mucking with the interactive add
> code actively), the prompt line is painted in prompt_color (you can
> tweak it with the color.interactive.prompt configuration variable,
> it defaults to BOLD BLUE) while the first part of the hunk header
> line is painted in the fraginfo color (default CYAN), which should
> give you even more visual distinction.
> 
> Perhaps
> 
>     [color "interactive"]
> 	prompt = bold red reverse
> 
> would be sufficient?  I dunno.