Re: [PATCH] Update the usage bundle string.
- From
Thiago Farina <tfransosi@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 17, 2009, 15:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <a4c8a6d00909170856t69695a33u86fbc7bc1d9a008@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <4AB1D364.1080701@viscovery.net>
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:12 AM, Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net> wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Thiago Farina schrieb: >> @@ -11,6 +11,12 @@ >> >> static const char *bundle_usage="git bundle (create <bundle> <git rev-list args> | verify <bundle> | list-heads <bundle> [refname]... | unbundle <bundle> [refname]... )"; > > Is this variable still used? Shouldn't it be removed?
Yeah it should be removed, I did this in the third email that I sent. To send another revision of the patch I'm doing this: $ git commit <filename> --amend $ git format-patch -1 --subject-prefix "Patch vN" But I'm not sure if this is the correct away to send another set of changes of the same patch. Is right?
Show 17 quoted lines
> >> +static const char builtin_bundle_usage[] = "\ >> + git bundle create <file> <git-rev-list args>\n\ >> + git bundle verify <file>\n\ >> + git bundle list-heads <file> [refname...]\n\ >> + git bundle unbundle <file> [refname...]"; > > You indent the usage text. Do other commands do that, too? If you resend, > it may be worth using this style: > > static const char builtin_bundle_usage[] = > "git bundle create <file> <git-rev-list args>\n" > "git bundle verify <file>\n" > ... > > i.e. not to use backslash-at-eol. >
Sure, I will update it to use this style. There is another usage string that uses backslash-at-eol, it is in builtin-pack-objecs.c . Should I update this string too?
Show 6 quoted lines
>> - if (argc < 3) >> - usage(bundle_usage); >> + if (argc < 3) >> + usage(builtin_bundle_usage); > > This re-indentation is an accident, isn't it?
Was an accident, sorry about that. I configured my editor to use 2 spaces per indent, tab size 2 and expand tabs to spaces. Git uses 4 spaces per indent and tab size 4?
> > -- Hannes > >