Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Optionally link worktrees with relative paths
- From
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
- Date
- Oct 25, 2024, 21:05 UTC
- Message-ID
- <ZxwIEcUKMELmxeMh@nand.local>
- In-Reply-To
- <20241025-wt_relative_paths-v3-0-8860a5321c01@pm.me>
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 08:57:17PM +0000, Caleb White wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Caleb White (5): > worktree: refactor infer_backlink() to use strbuf* > worktree: support worktrees linked with relative paths > worktree: optionally link worktrees with relative paths > worktree: add test for path handling in linked worktrees > worktree: add `relativeWorktrees` extension
The previous round was already merged to 'master' a few days ago[1], after merging it to 'next' and saying so in this[2] WC report.
I'm not sure if you intended to send this series as a follow-up to the state that was already merged to 'master', or if you had intended to send a new round of changes not knowing it had already been merged.
In either case, can you please send a new round based on the current tip of 'master'?
Thanks, Taylor
[1]: 8e08668322 (Merge branch 'cw/worktree-relative', 2024-10-22). [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/ZxLI06smvMuf%2FcT2@nand.local/