Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Optionally link worktrees with relative paths

From: Caleb White <cdwhite3@pm.me>
Date: Oct 25, 2024, 21:11 UTC
Message-ID: <D5572ICCKQXT.3UQ8AJ2GSUZIP@pm.me>
In-Reply-To: <ZxwIEcUKMELmxeMh@nand.local>

On Fri Oct 25, 2024 at 4:05 PM CDT, Taylor Blau wrote:

Show 23 quoted lines

> On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 08:57:17PM +0000, Caleb White wrote:
>> Caleb White (5):
>>       worktree: refactor infer_backlink() to use strbuf*
>>       worktree: support worktrees linked with relative paths
>>       worktree: optionally link worktrees with relative paths
>>       worktree: add test for path handling in linked worktrees
>>       worktree: add `relativeWorktrees` extension
>
> The previous round was already merged to 'master' a few days ago[1],
> after merging it to 'next' and saying so in this[2] WC report.
>
> I'm not sure if you intended to send this series as a follow-up to the
> state that was already merged to 'master', or if you had intended to
> send a new round of changes not knowing it had already been merged.
>
> In either case, can you please send a new round based on the current tip
> of 'master'?
>
> Thanks,
> Taylor
>
> [1]: 8e08668322 (Merge branch 'cw/worktree-relative', 2024-10-22).
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/ZxLI06smvMuf%2FcT2@nand.local/

Ah, I must've missed that---I was in the process of working on v4 and didn't realize that it had already been merged to master.

I'll send a new round based on the current tip of master.

Thanks! Caleb