Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] refs: introduce reftable backend

> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> 
> > this is the second version of my patch series that introduces the
> > reftable backend.
> >
> > This version addresses the feedback by Karthik. I don't think it really
> > makes sense to spell out every change here -- the range diff should
> > likely be easier to digest.
> 
> This, when merged to 'seen' (which also has "for-each-ref now thinks
> an empty string is a signal to show ref-like things outside the
> refs/ hierarchy" topic, kn/for-all-refs), seems to break *-reftable
> CI tests, cf.  https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/7765401528
> 
> I'll tentatively eject the topic from 'seen', even though I have a
> suspicion that it byitself would pass all the tests.
> 
> Thanks.