Re: [PATCH 01/10] t6700: mark test as leak-free
- From
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
- Date
- Oct 5, 2023, 17:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <ZR71EdeO1Ige1+Xe@nand.local>
- In-Reply-To
- <20231003202609.GA7812@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 04:26:09PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> This test has never leaked since it was added. Let's annotate it to make > sure it stays that way (and to reduce noise when looking for other > leak-free scripts after we fix some leaks). > > Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> > --- > Obviously not directly related to the rest; this could be spun off to > its own series, or put atop jk/tree-name-and-depth-limit and merged from > there.
I wondered how I missed this in tb/mark-more-tests-as-leak-free, but the answer is trivial: that topic preceded your tree depth stuff ;-).
This change makes good sense, and I don't think it's worth spinning off into its own series.
Thanks, Taylor