Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] hash: introduce unsafe_hash_algo(), drop unsafe_ variants

From: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Date: Jan 11, 2025, 17:14 UTC
Message-ID: <Z4Km9QaGflwAI7tA@nand.local>
In-Reply-To: <xmqq4j26cikd.fsf@gitster.g>

On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 04:14:58PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 10 quoted lines

> Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:
>
> > (This series is rebased on 'master', which is 14650065b7
> > (RelNotes/2.48.0: fix typos etc., 2025-01-07) at the time of writing).
>
> The previous round was based on
> <cover.1730833506.git.me@ttaylorr.com> which became
> 'tb/unsafe-hash-test', but this round is based on a recent 'master'
> that does not yet contain it?  Does it mean that the 2-patch series
> the previous round of this series was based on is no longer needed?

Those two patches got squashed together and became the first patch of this series, so 'tb/unsafe-hash-test' is safe to discard. Thank you for shuffling the patches around as always :-).

Thanks, Taylor