Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] bisect: output state before we are ready to compute bisection

From: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Date: May 6, 2022, 10:14 UTC
Message-ID: <YnT06hCm9zR287aY@chrisdown.name>
In-Reply-To: <YnSNWMBRZA0S8X26@nand.local>

Taylor Blau writes:

>Could or should these printf()'s be advise() calls instead? That would
>make it easier for users to turn them off if they don't want the extra
>output. At the very least, we should make sure that they are sent to
>stderr to discourage scripting around them.

Ah, I didn't know about advise(); looks like it could be reasonable to use here. If nobody objects, I'll change to advise() when the rest of the feedback has come in and v3 is sent.

Thanks!