Re: git revert --continue --no-verify
- From
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
- Date
- Aug 3, 2021, 22:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <YQm+PWAtc3rixqsw@nand.local>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAAVFnNmitHeimogaGUUwWGWhve+wbF6CXcSNUonGCWAgOSKzjA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 04:33:09PM -0500, Cameron Steffen wrote:
> Perhaps the issue then is that the pre-commit hook should not run for > `git revert --continue`? It does not run for `git revert`.
This does look like an oversight to me, but you'll have to bear with me since I am relatively unfamiliar with the sequencer code.
Ultimately `git revert` calls do_pick_commit() which either calls do_commit() or run_git_commit(). A couple of curiosities there:
- do_commit() does fall back to run_git_commit() if it has the
VERIFY_MSG bit set in `flags`.
- run_git_commit() passes `-n` only when VERIFY_MSG *isn't* set, so
the VERIFY_MSG bit does imply that the pre-commit hook would be run
there.
- when do_pick_commit() does have to fall back to run_git_commit(), it
sets the VERIFY_MSG bit in flags.But we never end up calling run_git_commit() (except in the case of errors) because do_pick_commit() special-cases `command == TODO_REVERT` (which is the case for `git revert`) and calls `do_commit()`.
But it gets weirder: do_commit() calls run_git_commit() itself, but before the caller in do_pick_commit() has had a chance to add VERIFY_MSG to the flags.
So I suspect that this is an oversight, but perhaps somebody more familiar with this code could confirm my thinking.
Thanks, Taylor