Re: Reviewed-by given by celebrities (no subject matter expertise on Git development)

> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> 
> > I don't usually post "me too" responses, since they are usually just
> > noise. But I could not resist it here, for two reasons:
> >
> >   - this is such a nicely written summary of what "Reviewed-by" means in
> >     our project that I think it deserves some praise. :)
> >
> >   - because it is ultimately about "what does Reviewed-by mean within
> >     the Git project", there is some small value in having another
> >     project member say "yes, that is exactly what I expect from it,
> >     too"
> 
> Heh, thanks.
> 
> Are you hinting that some of what I wrote (with typofixes like
> s/arond/around/) should be inserted to SubmittingPatches or
> somewhere near it?