Re: [PATCH] refs: switch peel_ref() to peel_iterated_oid()
- From
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
- Date
- Jan 20, 2021, 20:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <YAiOPzOT52v+dOgL@nand.local>
- In-Reply-To
- <YAiIK+/hSRxaUx/K@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 02:44:43PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> This has been bugging me for years, and came up again in: > > https://lore.kernel.org/git/YAhXw9Gvn5Pyvacq@coredump.intra.peff.net/ > > so I decided to finally do something about it. There's a minor textual > conflict with the caller being touched in that thread, but it's easy to > resolve. So I think it's OK to consider the two independent. > > The commit message turned out rather long. I hope that doesn't scare > anybody away, but I wanted to cover all of the bases.
Thanks for all of the detail. Suffice it to say, I was not scared away, and am in fact quite comfortable with this direction.
Sorry for sending such a short response to such a long email, but I agree with the discussion in the patch message, and I don't have anything to add other than my approval and a:
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Thanks, Taylor