Re: [PATCH v4] am: Allow passing --no-verify flag
- From
- Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 21, 2022, 17:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Y6NApq8pFcqkvlFg@orome>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqtu1prt2j.fsf@gitster.g>
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 06:42:44PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 32 quoted lines
> Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> writes: > > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 09:55:18AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes: > >> > >> > ... > >> > The same comment as the previous one applies to "test_cmp_rev second" > >> > check. I think removing them would make the tests better. > >> > >> I will queue this on top for now. Thanks. > > > > Just to clarify: do you want me to send out another version with your > > changes on top or should I consider this done? > > It is up to you. > > * If you agree with the "fix-up" done with the extra commit (marked > as "SQUASH???") on top and there is no other changes you want to > make, you can tell me to squash it into your patch. > > * If you don't and have better idea, you can send out an updated > version, and you have my permission to include any (or all) parts > of the changes I gave in the message you are responding to. > > * Or if you make a very good argument and convince me why your > original without my fix-up is better, I may change my mind and > drop the changes, keeping your original alone. > > Of course, folks on the list may have other suggestions and review > comments, which may change the picture again ;-) > > In any case, thanks for contributing!
Your changes look fine. I applied them to my local tree and everything still works as expected, so feel free to squash those into the commit.
Thanks, Thierry