Re: [PATCH 5/7] diffcore-rename: reduce jumpiness in progress counters
- From
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
- Date
- Dec 9, 2020, 22:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <X9FOtEiN7C7cp+KS@nand.local>
- In-Reply-To
- <e8257516c1f983d590b8a81fb32ecd5cb91dc737.1607223276.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 02:54:34AM +0000, Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote:
Show 18 quoted lines
> From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> > > Inexact rename detection works by comparing all sources to all > destinations, computing similarities, and then finding the best matches > among those that are sufficiently similar. > > However, it is preceded by exact rename detection that works by > checking if there are files with identical hashes. If exact renames are > found, we can exclude some files from inexact rename detection. > > The inexact rename detection loops over the full set of files, but > immediately skips those for which rename_dst[i].is_rename is true and > thus doesn't compare any sources to that destination. As such, these > paths shouldn't be included in the progress counter. > > For the eagle eyed, this change hints at an actual optimization -- the > first one I presented at Git Merge 2020. I'll be submitting that > optimization later, once the basic merge-ort algorithm has merged.
;-) I was hoping that that was the case.
Show 25 quoted lines
> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
> ---
> diffcore-rename.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/diffcore-rename.c b/diffcore-rename.c
> index 7270eb6af48..3d637ba4645 100644
> --- a/diffcore-rename.c
> +++ b/diffcore-rename.c
> @@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ void diffcore_rename(struct diff_options *options)
> if (options->show_rename_progress) {
> progress = start_delayed_progress(
> _("Performing inexact rename detection"),
> - (uint64_t)rename_dst_nr * (uint64_t)rename_src_nr);
> + (uint64_t)num_targets * (uint64_t)rename_src_nr);
> }
>
> mx = xcalloc(st_mult(NUM_CANDIDATE_PER_DST, num_targets), sizeof(*mx));
> @@ -626,7 +626,8 @@ void diffcore_rename(struct diff_options *options)
> diff_free_filespec_blob(two);
> }
> dst_cnt++;
> - display_progress(progress, (uint64_t)(i+1)*(uint64_t)rename_src_nr);
> + display_progress(progress,
> + (uint64_t)dst_cnt * (uint64_t)rename_src_nr);Both of these spots need only one cast, but the patch itself looks correct (with or without dropping a cast on one of the operands in each expression).
Thanks, Taylor