Re: http protocol, cloning git.git, fails (too many open files)
- From
- wa1ter@myrealbox.com <wa1ter@myrealbox.com>
- Date
- Nov 14, 2005, 13:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.NEB.4.63.0511140458110.17527@x9.ybpnyarg>
- In-Reply-To
- <20051114010940.GQ30496@pasky.or.cz>
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 02:09:40 +0100 > From: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> > Cc: git@vger.kernel.org > Newsgroups: gmane.comp.version-control.git > Subject: Re: http protocol, cloning git.git, fails (too many open files) > > Dear diary, on Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 01:42:33AM CET, I got a letter > where wa1ter@myrealbox.com said that...
> > So, what does cogito do differently...
> Cogito uses the same logic and underlying GIT fetching commands for
> cloning as well as for fetching, while git-clone uses some custom logic
> for cloning ("dumb http clone")...BTW, I just noticed one big difference between git clone and cg-clone:
git clone stores the URL in .git/remotes/origin while cg-clone puts it in .git/branches/origin. When I do a cg-update after a git clone then cg-update can't find the URL.