From: wa1ter@myrealbox.com Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 13:09:40 GMT Subject: Re: http protocol, cloning git.git, fails (too many open files) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20051114010940.GQ30496@pasky.or.cz> On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Petr Baudis wrote: > Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 02:09:40 +0100 > From: Petr Baudis > Cc: git@vger.kernel.org > Newsgroups: gmane.comp.version-control.git > Subject: Re: http protocol, cloning git.git, fails (too many open files) > > Dear diary, on Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 01:42:33AM CET, I got a letter > where wa1ter@myrealbox.com said that... > > So, what does cogito do differently... > Cogito uses the same logic and underlying GIT fetching commands for > cloning as well as for fetching, while git-clone uses some custom logic > for cloning ("dumb http clone")... BTW, I just noticed one big difference between git clone and cg-clone: git clone stores the URL in .git/remotes/origin while cg-clone puts it in .git/branches/origin. When I do a cg-update after a git clone then cg-update can't find the URL.