Re: [PATCH] status&commit: Teach them to show commits of modified submodules.
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Nov 12, 2007, 09:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711120950370.4362@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <47380019.1000704@viscovery.net>
Hi,
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Johannes Sixt wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano schrieb: > > > I am not saying that it is wrong to use submodule to track such groups > > of source trees whose versions are very closely tied together. At > > least not yet. > > In KDE, the supermodule will actually just be a container that binds the > submodules together. The essential development will happen in the > submodules, and the supermodule will receive a commit quite frequently. > In this case, there will often be only a few or a few dozen commits > listed, and I anticipate that the integrator who is going to make the > commit (to the supermodule) will probably like the summary. So I'm all > for it.
I like it, too. And we can make the number of shown commits configurable, just like for the merge summary. But I'd rather see the code in wt-status.c than in git-submodule.sh.
Ciao, Dscho