Re: [PATCH] git-format-patch: Number patches when there are more than one
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Nov 3, 2007, 16:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711031631020.4362@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <1194104694-12530-1-git-send-email-mh@glandium.org>
Hi,
On Sat, 3 Nov 2007, Mike Hommey wrote:
Show 23 quoted lines
> Automagically enable numbering if we output more than one patch. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> > --- > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 10:44:12AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, Andreas Ericsson wrote: > > > > > [PATCH 1/1] looks a bit silly, and automagically handling this in > > > git-format-patch makes some scripting around it a lot more pleasant. > > > > I think you should not use "-n" if you do not want to have the numbers. > > In circumstances as yours, where you can have patch series larger than > > one, I imagine that the "[PATCH 1/1]" bears an important information, > > which is not present in "[PATCH]": this patch series contains only one > > patch. > > > > IOW I do not like your patch: too much DWIDNS (Do What I Did NOT Say) for > > me. > > How about the contrary ?
Still DWIDNSAA.
Ciao, Dscho