Re: [PATCH 0/14] fork/exec removal series
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Oct 14, 2007, 02:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710140348550.25221@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <20071014021149.GO27899@spearce.org>
Hi,
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
> Since builtin-pack-objects now accepts (limited) pthread support, > perhaps this should be implemented in terms of pthread support when > pthreads are available?
Falling back to fork() when no pthreads are available? Yes, that makes sense.
It might also (marginally) speed up operations, since the switches between threads are cheaper than those between processes, right?
Ciao, Dscho