Re: [PATCH] rebase -i: commit when continuing after "edit"

> Johannes Schindelin schrieb:
> 
> > On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> > > How about:
> > > 
> > > 	eval "$author_script"
> > > 	GIT_AUTHOR_NAME="$GIT_AUTHOR_NAME" \
> > > 	GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL="$GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL" \
> > > 	GIT_AUTHOR_DATE="$GIT_AUTHOR_DATE" \
> > > 	$USE_OUTPUT git commit -F "$MSG" $EDIT_COMMIT
> > > 
> > > and if you dislike that, put the two questionable lines in parenthesis.
> > 
> > That looks ugly.  I'd rather have something like
> > 
> > 	eval "$USE_OUTPUT $author_script git commit -F \"$MSG\" $EDIT_COMMIT"
> > 
> > but I'm not quite certain if that is enough, what with the funny 
> > characters people put into path names these days ($MSG points to 
> > "$DOTEST"/message).
> 
> I, too, find it ugly, but I think it's the most readable way to do it. 
> Your version is certainly underquoted.
> 
> I poked around a bit, but one major obstacle is that the assignments in 
> $author_script are on separate lines, which you would have to splice 
> into a single line before you can insert them in the eval.