Re: diffcore-rename performance mode
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Sep 18, 2007, 11:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709181220130.28586@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <20070918085413.GA11751@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Hi,
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Jeff King wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 01:49:50AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > However, keeping around _just_ the cnt_data caused only about 100M > > > of extra memory consumption (and gave the same performance boost). > > > > That would be an interesting and relatively low-hanging optimization. > > OK, I will work up a patch. Is it worth making it configurable?
Yes, I think it would be worth making it configurable... For example, one of the machines I work on has only 128M.
Thanks, Dscho