From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:20:52 GMT
Subject: Re: diffcore-rename performance mode
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709181220130.28586@racer.site>
In-Reply-To: <20070918085413.GA11751@coredump.intra.peff.net>

Hi,

On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Jeff King wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 01:49:50AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> > > However, keeping around _just_ the cnt_data caused only about 100M 
> > > of extra memory consumption (and gave the same performance boost).
> > 
> > That would be an interesting and relatively low-hanging optimization.
> 
> OK, I will work up a patch. Is it worth making it configurable?

Yes, I think it would be worth making it configurable... For example, one 
of the machines I work on has only 128M.

Thanks,
Dscho