Re: metastore (was: Track /etc directory using Git)

> On Sat, 15 Sep 2007, martin f krafft wrote:
> > I understand also that this is not top priority for git, which is why 
> > I said earlier in the thread that the real difficulty might be to get 
> > Junio to accept a patch. But I think that the patch would be rather 
> > contained and small, having it all configurable would make it 
> > unintrusive, and if we all test it real well, it should pass as a 
> > bonus. After all, git can e.g upload patches to IMAP boxes, which in 
> > my world clearly is bonus material as well.
> 
> I also think such configuration option would be cool.