Re: Track /etc directory using Git
- From
- martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>
- Date
- Sep 15, 2007, 15:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070915154225.GA17704@piper.oerlikon.madduck.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20070915152724.GC27494@artemis.corp>
also sprach Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> [2007.09.15.1727 +0200]:
Show 7 quoted lines
> > I think it doesn't get bloated until you try to support the model of > > tracking different stuff for different files in the same repo. If > > you just track one set of data across all files in the repo, I don't > > think it'll cause too much bloat. > > Yeah but if the stuff is opaque to git, you'll definitely end up with > security issues, which makes it also a no-go for /etc versionning.
With "opaque to git" do you mean "implemented outside git"?
I'd say if done properly inside git, the security issues could be prevented.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
"this sentence contradicts itself -- no actually it doesn't."
-- douglas hofstadter