Re: [PATCH 5/3] archive: rename attribute specfile to export-subst

From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Sep 7, 2007, 10:45 UTC
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709071144450.28586@racer.site>
In-Reply-To: <7vd4wva4lv.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

Hi,

On Thu, 6 Sep 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 9 quoted lines

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> 
> > The bigger question is now if these two patches should be folded back 
> > into your original patch series, or stand alone as commits of their 
> > own...
> 
> That is no brainer, as there is a simple and hard rule that any topic 
> already in 'next' are not to be rewound ever.  Follow-up patches are the 
> right thing to do in this case.

Right. At the time I suggested it, I was not aware that the patches were in next already.

Sorry, Dscho