Re: pull-fetch-param.txt
- From
Julian Phillips <julian@quantumfyre.co.uk>
- Date
- Jul 20, 2007, 17:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707201758330.26817@reaper.quantumfyre.co.uk>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vbqe7xbvq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org> writes: > >>> I'll check with the docbook-xsl Debian maintainer. >> >> The change in docbook-xsl was by intention, please see >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=420114#22 > > Hmph. Where does that leave us poor users who would want to > support both 1.71 and 1.72, I wonder... > > Will they have the same revert in 1.73 for that House Sign, too?
It looks like they do, so perhaps we could just say that you will have issues building the git docs with 1.72 and ignore my last patch?
(comparing http://docbook.xml-doc.org/snapshots/xsl/manpages/utility.xsl which has today's date and uses . and \ against http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/1.72.0/manpages/utility.xsl which uses U+2302 and U+2593)
-- Julian --- Old MacDonald had an agricultural real estate tax abatement.