Re: pull-fetch-param.txt

From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Oct 4, 2006, 16:28 UTC
Message-ID: <4523E120.6050007@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
In-Reply-To: <7v64f1np8i.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> writes:

...

>> I.e. the first and second + were swallowed, but not the third one.

...

Show 21 quoted lines

> Without looking at asciidoc 8.0 source, my guess is that it
> treats _anything_ that has two pluses on the same input line as
> quoted by some magical '+'-pair quote.   Can you try
> reformatting the original
> 
>> <refspec>::
>> 	The canonical format of a <refspec> parameter is
>> 	`+?<src>:<dst>`; that is, an optional plus `+`, followed
>> 	by the source ref, followed by a colon `:`, followed by
>> 	the destination ref.
> 
> to something like
> 
>> <refspec>::
>> 	The canonical format of a <refspec> parameter is
>> 	`+?<src>:<dst>`; that is, an optional plus
>> 	`+`, followed
>> 	by the source ref, followed by a colon `:`, followed by
>> 	the destination ref.
> 
> and verify that conjecture?

This hack does not help. The two `+` are still absent from the manpage (but as before, the `+` in the next paragraph is printed as desired).

-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-==- =-=- --=--
http://arcgraph.de/sr/