Re: [BUG] gitk fails with argument that is both existing directory and branch name
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jul 3, 2007, 22:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707032343160.4071@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.0.98.0707031514160.9434@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Hi,
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > Umm. Why don't you just use gitk linus/master..fixes? This is how we > > teach people to use rev-list anyway. > > No, Uwe is right. There's a bug somewhere.
I never questioned that there is a bug. I was only wondering why he used that ambiguous way to specify a range, when a range is clearly what he wants.
Ah well. I'll look into it.
Ciao, Dscho