From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 22:44:19 GMT
Subject: Re: [BUG] gitk fails with argument that is both existing directory and branch name
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707032343160.4071@racer.site>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0707031514160.9434@woody.linux-foundation.org>

Hi,

On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> 
> > Umm. Why don't you just use gitk linus/master..fixes? This is how we 
> > teach people to use rev-list anyway.
> 
> No, Uwe is right. There's a bug somewhere.

I never questioned that there is a bug. I was only wondering why he used 
that ambiguous way to specify a range, when a range is clearly what he 
wants.

Ah well. I'll look into it.

Ciao,
Dscho