Re: [PATCH/RFH] pp_header(): work around possible memory corruption
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jun 23, 2007, 23:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706240031220.4059@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vps3w4g9x.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.pobox.com>
Hi,
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> At least the older humongous pretty_print_commit() got separated into > manageable chunks, and I was happy. I was just too lazy when > refactoring the code and stopped there.
Understandable.
> The right fix is to propagate the "realloc as needed" callchain into > add_user_info(), instead of having "this should be enough" there. > These two you touched are the only two callsite of that static function.
I had a go at this, but unfortunately I do not understand enough of what is going on there. For example, add_rfc2047() sometimes quotes some text. I have no idea what a conservative estimate of the growth is, so I cannot continue there.
Sorry, Dscho