Re: [PATCH] Add git-submodule command
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- May 25, 2007, 13:58 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705251451530.4648@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <8c5c35580705250646h12f4f30bt301f4c4bdc2ad530@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Fri, 25 May 2007, Lars Hjemli wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> On 5/25/07, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 25 May 2007, Lars Hjemli wrote:
> >
> > > +modules_init()
> > > +{
> > > + git ls-files --stage -- $@ | grep -e '^160000 ' |
> >
> > Any reason you read in the stage? It does not seem that you use it.
>
> Are there any other way to get the mode info?Ah, I missed that. Right.
Show 10 quoted lines
> > > + subsha1=$(cd "$path" && git-rev-parse --verify HEAD) || > > > > Maybe it would be a better idea to use "git --git-dir="$path" > > rev-parse ..."? Just in case somebody calls this with GIT_DIR > > overridden... > > > > Or, unset GIT_DIR explicitely. > > Hmm, that's annoying (overridden GIT_DIR). I guess 'git --git-dir > $path/.git' would be the easiest solution.
But you have to repeat it on every subsequent Git command. OTOH if you unset GIT_DIR, you can no longer be sure that you have the correct git dir for Git calls in the superproject...
Show 15 quoted lines
> > > + die "Unable to find current revision of submodule '$path'" > > > + > > > + if test "$subsha1" != "$sha1" > > > + then > > > + $(cd "$path" && git-fetch && git-checkout -q > > "$sha1") || > > > > This will make a detached HEAD, right? Do you want that? (I am not > > really interested in submodules myself, so I haven't thought about it, > > and I haven't followed that monster discussion.) > > Well, we might want to be smarter about this, but on the other hand: if > the user cares, he can always do 'cd $path && git checkout $branch', > since 'git submodule -u' will skip submodules with the correct commit > checked out.
Fair enough, I guess...
> > I'll let Junio comment on that command line parsing... > > Heh, I'm a shell illiterate...
;-)
I guess Junio would like one of his famous
case ,"$init","$update",[...] in *1*1) usage esac
to prevent running with two actions...
Show 6 quoted lines
> > All in all, I like it: it is short, to the point, and it should do the > > job (maybe with a few enhancements like "--update" without arguments > > means _all_ submodules). > > Well, it does (or should) update all initialized submodules, but maybe > that's not what you meant?
Oops. I meant "init". I mean, most people who want to clone a superproject want the submodules being initialized without hassles, probably. But maybe that should be another option: "--clone-superproject" or something. Dunno. There's time for that after the initial git-submodule.
Ciao, Dscho