Re: [PATCH 3/3] Teach 'diff' about 'nodiff' attribute.
- From
Julian Phillips <julian@quantumfyre.co.uk>
- Date
- Apr 13, 2007, 14:26 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704131525260.12853@reaper.quantumfyre.co.uk>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.0.98.0704131007140.28181@xanadu.home>
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Andy Parkins wrote: > >> If I've understood the attributes system correctly, it's worth bearing >> in mind that "!diff" is not the same as "nodiff". The not in "!diff" >> means "supress the attribute diff", not as you would traditionally >> imagine "not-diff". In this case it doesn't matter because there are >> only two possibilities for the diff engine - show the diff or don't. >> However, more attributes might get added that aren't so simple. >> >> Junio - This makes me think that perhaps "!" is not the right symbol for >> this - that's going to get read by programmers everywhere as NOT, >> rather than suppress. Perhaps it doesn't matter, I might be >> over-thinking this. > > Maybe "-" then? That better convey the notion of suppression while "!" > is more about negation.
"-flag" will certainly be a more familiar way to say "disable flag" to gentoo users ... ;)
-- Julian --- Lie, n.: A very poor substitute for the truth, but the only one discovered to date.