Re: [PATCH 3/3] Teach 'diff' about 'nodiff' attribute.
- From
- Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 13, 2007, 11:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200704131230.41594.andyparkins@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <461F602C.E9803108@eudaptics.com>
On Friday 2007, April 13, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> -- Hannes "Can't we not have no double negation please?" Sixt
There's nothing wrong with double negatives per se. They often confer more meaning than simple logic would suggest.
For example:
I can't not hate CVS I hate CVS
Logically identical, but semantically different. In the first, the speak would be suggesting that they've tried, but failed, to like CVS; in the second the speaker just hates it. Language isn't logic, it's fuzzy logic :-).
The reason I think it's relevant to bring this up is that I think identifier naming in programming should try to use language to lead the reader down the same thought path as the writer.
You want a flag that controls whether a thread is running - should it be called RunFlag or StopFlag?
while( RunFlag )
while( !StopFlag )
I think that the context is important.
I, personally, wouldn't like to say which is correct in that case - or in the "nodiff"/"!diff" question. However, I don't think it's correct to universally rule out all double negative use - they have their place.
Andy
-- Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIET andyparkins@gmail.com