Re: [PATCH] Replacing the system call pread() with lseek()/xread()/lseek() sequence.

> Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org> wrote:
> > How likely are we ever to be in the right place here?  Seems vanishingly
> > small putting us firmly in the four syscalls per call space.  I wonder
> > if git ever actually cares about the seek location.  ie if we could stop
> > reading and resetting it.  Probabally not worth working it out I guess
> > as any _sane_ system has one.
> 
> Andy's right actually.  If we are using pread() we aren't relying
> on the current file pointer.  Which means its unnecessary to get
> the current pointer before seeking to the requested offset, and its
> unnecessary to restore it before the git_pread() function returns.