Re: [PATCH] git-rev-list(1): group options; reformat; document more options
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Date
- Aug 31, 2006, 23:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608311611440.27779@g5.osdl.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20060831230811.GE482@diku.dk>
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Jonas Fonseca wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote Thu, Aug 31, 2006: > > > > Umm? You should get a "usage" error, no? > > Yes, ok, they do not seem to make sense for git-rev-list, however if you > pass either to git-log, the output seems to make room for a diff, adding > one extra newline, but without appending any diff.
Ahh. I think that a "-r" without any other request for patches (or "--name-status" or similar) should probably imply "--raw". At least that was how it historically worked..
Anyway, _if_ it ever worked (and I think it did, but I'm way too lazy to bother checking), this may have been broken by the extensive diff option cleanups by Timo in June. Timo? Junio?
Linus