Re: packs and trees

From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Date: Jun 20, 2006, 20:51 UTC
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606201650180.3377@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <46a038f90606201241x3dec242dicde245a24c3ab9ab@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Martin Langhoff wrote:

Show 16 quoted lines

> On 6/21/06, Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> > 
> > > On 6/20/06, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > The plan is to modify rcs2git from parsecvs to create all of the git
> > > > objects for the tree.
> > >
> > > Sounds like a good plan. Have you seen recent discussions about it
> > > being impossible to repack usefully when you don't have trees (and
> > > resulting performance problems on ext3).
> > 
> > What do you mean?
> 
> I was thinking of the "repacking disconnected objects" thread, but now
> I see it did have a solution in listing all the objects and paths. I
> take that back.

OK.

Nicolas