Re: packs and trees
- From
Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 20, 2006, 19:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <46a038f90606201241x3dec242dicde245a24c3ab9ab@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606201102410.3377@localhost.localdomain>
On 6/21/06, Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Martin Langhoff wrote: > > > On 6/20/06, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The plan is to modify rcs2git from parsecvs to create all of the git > > > objects for the tree. > > > > Sounds like a good plan. Have you seen recent discussions about it > > being impossible to repack usefully when you don't have trees (and > > resulting performance problems on ext3). > > What do you mean?
I was thinking of the "repacking disconnected objects" thread, but now I see it did have a solution in listing all the objects and paths. I take that back.
If you are asking about the ext3 performance problems, I think Linus discussed that a while ago, why unpacked repos are slow (in addition to huge), and there were some suggestions of using hashed directory indexes.
cheers,
martin