Re: [PATCH] [BUG] Add a test to check git-prune does not throw away revs hidden by a graft.
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Date
- May 19, 2006, 20:45 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605191344200.10823@g5.osdl.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20060519202540.GF6535@nowhere.earth>
On Fri, 19 May 2006, Yann Dirson wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> > > We _could_ decide that fsck should just follow the "real parents" and the > > grafts _both_. That's the safe thing to do by default. Possibly with a > > flag to say "prefer one over the other", or even a "prefer which-ever > > exists". > > I'm not sure I see how "prefer which-ever exists" would be useful - do > you have anything precise in mind ?
It would be a "once you've pruned one or the other, don't complain any more about the fact that it doesn't exist" flag.
Linus