Re: Do "git add" as a builtin
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Date
- May 18, 2006, 17:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605181020570.10823@g5.osdl.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vzmhfnupz.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> > Perhaps, but unresolve splits an entry that is available from > the heads being merged, so it would use unverified filename to > try finding the ents from trees, but get_tree_entry() would not > find one, so I think we are safe already.
Yes, I agree, that looks safe.
> I doubt this would break people's scripts. If they were relying > on the old behaviour, that means they threw real paths and > garbage at update-index and relied on it to sift them apart, > which indicates they were buggy to begin with anyway.
Agreed. I don't think the semantic change can really break anything, and if anything will probably help expose any really strange/broken stuff.
Linus