Re: git-svn and huge data and modifying the git-svn-HEAD branch directly
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Date
- Mar 19, 2006, 19:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603191134530.3826@g5.osdl.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20060319191243.GB18185@pasky.or.cz>
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > (i) I _think_ that it would be less of a surprise if a branch would be > checked first.
Yeah, I guess that's true.
> Actually, I'm almost inclined to suggest making Git fail violently in > case of an ambiguous name.
Maybe not fail, but at least warn very loudly.
Linus